2008 Citroen C1 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2008 Citroen C1 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2006 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 3 (150 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen C1 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | C1 | 3 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 998 cc | 1999 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 183 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.6 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 55 L |
