2008 Citroen C2 vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2008 Citroen C2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Citroen C2 (126 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen C2 (143 Nm) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2008 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C2 | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C2 | 66 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 143 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78.6 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |