2008 Citroen C2 vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2008 Citroen C2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Citroen C2 (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C2 weights approximately 42 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen C2 (150 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C2 | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Citroen | Mercury |
Model | C2 | Lynx |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2400 mm |