2008 Citroen C2 vs. 2006 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2008 Citroen C2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 70 kg more than 2008 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Suzuki Reno is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Suzuki Reno will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C2. (151 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C2 | 2006 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Citroen | Suzuki |
Model | C2 | Reno |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.2 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 55 L |