2008 Citroen C2 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (104 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C2. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C2 weights approximately 41 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen C2 (150 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 6. (145 Nm). This means 2008 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C2 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 6 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1595 cc |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.2 seconds | 11 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |