2008 Citroen C3 vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 2008 Citroen C3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Citroen C3 (74 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Humber Hawk weights approximately 430 kg more than 2008 Citroen C3.
Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Humber Hawk (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1962 Humber Hawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C3 | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
Make | Citroen | Humber |
Model | C3 | Hawk |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 118 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 130 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1570 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 72 L |