2008 Citroen C3 vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 2008 Citroen C3 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Volvo 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Citroen C3 (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C3 weights approximately 111 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C3. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1962 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C3 | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C3 | 220 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1358 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 133 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1126 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |