2008 Citroen C3 vs. 2004 Maybach 62
To start off, 2008 Citroen C3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Maybach 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Maybach 62 would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maybach 62 (542 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 455 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1679 kg more than 2008 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Maybach 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Maybach 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maybach 62 (900 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 767 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C3. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2004 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C3. 2004 Maybach 62 has automatic transmission and 2008 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2008 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Maybach 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen C3 | 2004 Maybach 62 | |
| Make | Citroen | Maybach |
| Model | C3 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1358 cc | 5513 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 900 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 82.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.9 seconds | 5.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1126 kg | 2805 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3870 mm | 6170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3830 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 16 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 110 L |
