2008 Citroen C5 vs. 1966 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2008 Citroen C5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,997 cc, 2008 Citroen C5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C5 weights approximately 498 kg more than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Because 1966 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen C5 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford 12 M. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford 12 M.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C5 | 1966 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C5 | 12 M |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1699 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 82.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 82 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 68 L |