2008 Citroen C5 vs. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward
To start off, 2008 Citroen C5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward weights approximately 1057 kg more than 2008 Citroen C5.
Because 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward (490 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C5. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C5 | 2005 Rolls-Royce Park Ward | |
Make | Citroen | Rolls-Royce |
Model | C5 | Park Ward |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 5379 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 322 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 490 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 2450 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 100 L |