2008 Citroen C5 vs. 2006 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Citroen C5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 152 kg more than 2008 Citroen C5.
Because 2006 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Citroen C5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C5. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2006 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C5 | 2006 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | C5 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 319 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 98.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86.7 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1393 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 72 L |