2008 Citroen C6 vs. 1969 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2008 Citroen C6 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Citroen C6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Citroen C6 (208 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1969 Jaguar 240. (131 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C6 should accelerate faster than 1969 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen C6 weights approximately 378 kg more than 1969 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen C6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen C6 (290 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jaguar 240. (198 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Citroen C6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C6 | 1969 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | C6 | 240 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.9:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1818 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 12.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 54 L |