2008 Citroen C8 vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2008 Citroen C8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2008 Citroen C8. (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 2 kg more than 2008 Citroen C8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (383 Nm) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen C8. (285 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen C8.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen C8 | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | C8 | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 383 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1837 kg | 1839 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 87 L |