2008 Citroen Multispace vs. 1992 Volvo 240
To start off, 2008 Citroen Multispace is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 240 weights approximately 92 kg more than 2008 Citroen Multispace.
Because 1992 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Multispace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Volvo 240 (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Multispace. (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Multispace.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Multispace | 1992 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Multispace | 240 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1204 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2660 mm |