2008 Citroen Multispace vs. 2006 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2008 Citroen Multispace is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 6,063 cc, 2006 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Multispace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 450 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Multispace. (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Multispace. 2006 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 2008 Citroen Multispace has manual transmission. 2008 Citroen Multispace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Multispace | 2006 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Multispace | Charger |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 6063 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 425 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 72 L |