2008 Citroen Multispace vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Citroen Multispace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Citroen Multispace would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Citroen Multispace. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Multispace. (120 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Multispace.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Multispace | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Multispace | BT-50 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3010 mm |