2008 Citroen Picasso vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 2008 Citroen Picasso is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Picasso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Picasso. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Picasso.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Picasso | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Picasso | RX-7 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1749 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 190 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2430 mm |