2008 Citroen Picasso vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2008 Citroen Picasso is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 2,521 cc, 2001 Volvo SCC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2008 Citroen Picasso. (94 HP @ 3000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 2008 Citroen Picasso. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Volvo SCC weights approximately 136 kg more than 2008 Citroen Picasso. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Picasso. (135 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Picasso. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 2008 Citroen Picasso has manual transmission. 2008 Citroen Picasso will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen Picasso | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Picasso | SCC |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 70 L |
