2008 Citroen Picasso vs. 2003 MG ZT
To start off, 2008 Citroen Picasso is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG ZT would be higher. At 1,951 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MG ZT is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG ZT weights approximately 165 kg more than 2008 Citroen Picasso.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MG ZT (300 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Picasso. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 MG ZT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Picasso. 2003 MG ZT has automatic transmission and 2008 Citroen Picasso has manual transmission. 2008 Citroen Picasso will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MG ZT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Picasso | 2003 MG ZT | |
Make | Citroen | MG |
Model | Picasso | ZT |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1749 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2760 mm |