2008 Citroen Picasso vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Citroen Picasso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Citroen Picasso would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Picasso. (160 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Picasso. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 2008 Citroen Picasso has manual transmission. 2008 Citroen Picasso will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Picasso | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Citroen | Honda |
Model | Picasso | CR-V |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1749 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 160 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4554 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1819 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 58 L |