2008 Citroen Picasso vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Citroen Picasso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Citroen Picasso would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 475 kg more than 2008 Citroen Picasso.

Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Citroen Picasso. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (450 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Picasso. (160 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Picasso.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Citroen Picasso 2013 Jaguar XJ
Make Citroen Jaguar
Model Picasso XJ
Year Released 2008 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1749 cc 2995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 335 HP
Torque 160 Nm 450 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.7 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 81.4 mm 89 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.8:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline / Electric Hybrid
Top Speed 190 km/hour 195 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 12.2 seconds 6.4 seconds
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Manual CVT
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1320 kg 1795 kg
Vehicle Length 4280 mm 5127 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 2105 mm
Vehicle Height 1640 mm 1456 mm
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 3032 mm