2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2008 Citroen Xsara is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 192 kg more than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1968 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar 240 (204 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Xsara. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen Xsara | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
| Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
| Model | Xsara | 240 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2483 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 131 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2740 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 54 L |
