2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 1969 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2008 Citroen Xsara is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 476 kg more than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Because 1969 ZAZ 966 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 ZAZ 966. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Xsara | 1969 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Citroen | ZAZ |
Model | Xsara | 966 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 887 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 72.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 54.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1216 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2170 mm |