2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2008 Citroen Xsara is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 256 kg more than 1976 Mazda RX-2.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Xsara. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Xsara | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1216 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |