2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2008 Citroen Xsara is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Citroen Xsara (108 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 467 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen Xsara (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Citroen Xsara | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | Xsara | 102 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 108 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1237 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2160 mm |
