2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 1983 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2008 Citroen Xsara is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jeep CJ weights approximately 74 kg more than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1983 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Citroen Xsara. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jeep CJ (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Xsara. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1983 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Xsara | 1983 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | Xsara | CJ |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1216 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |