2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 2008 Citroen Xsara is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv weights approximately 2 kg more than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Xsara. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Xsara | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Xsara | RX-Evolv |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 276 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 214 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1360 mm |