2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 1999 Volvo C70
To start off, 2008 Citroen Xsara is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Volvo C70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Volvo C70 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 1999 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Volvo C70 weights approximately 127 kg more than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Volvo C70 (220 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Xsara. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1999 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Xsara | 1999 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Xsara | C70 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |