2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 2000 Volvo V40

To start off, 2008 Citroen Xsara is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Volvo V40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Volvo V40 would be higher. Both 2008 Citroen Xsara and 2000 Volvo V40 are equipped with a 1,587 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 108 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Volvo V40 weights approximately 146 kg more than 2008 Citroen Xsara.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Citroen Xsara (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Volvo V40. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Volvo V40.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Citroen Xsara 2000 Volvo V40
Make Citroen Volvo
Model Xsara V40
Year Released 2008 2000
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 1587 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 108 HP 108 HP
Torque 148 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.5 mm 81.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 82 mm 77 mm
Acceleration 0-100mph 11 seconds 12 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1209 kg 1355 kg
Vehicle Length 4190 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 60 L