2008 Citroen Xsara vs. 2012 Ford E-150
To start off, 2012 Ford E-150 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1363 kg more than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Because 2012 Ford E-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford E-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford E-150 (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Citroen Xsara. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2012 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Citroen Xsara | 2012 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Xsara | E-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1248 kg | 2611 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 132 L |