2008 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford ST 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford ST 460 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 331 more horse power than 2008 Daewoo Evanda. (129 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 2008 Daewoo Evanda.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford ST 460. (178 Nm). This means 2008 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford ST 460.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Daewoo Evanda | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Evanda | ST 460 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2580 mm |