2008 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1984 Rover 3500
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Rover 3500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Rover 3500 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Rover 3500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Rover 3500 (187 HP @ 5280 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2008 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Rover 3500 should accelerate faster than 2008 Daewoo Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Rover 3500 weights approximately 555 kg more than 2008 Daewoo Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Rover 3500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Rover 3500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Rover 3500 (298 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Daewoo Matiz. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1984 Rover 3500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Daewoo Matiz. 1984 Rover 3500 has automatic transmission and 2008 Daewoo Matiz has manual transmission. 2008 Daewoo Matiz will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Rover 3500 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Daewoo Matiz | 1984 Rover 3500 | |
Make | Daewoo | Rover |
Model | Matiz | 3500 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5280 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 298 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 71.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Top Speed | 152 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 1431 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2820 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 66 L |