2008 Daewoo Matiz vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Daewoo Matiz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Daewoo Matiz would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2008 Daewoo Matiz. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 2008 Daewoo Matiz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Daewoo Matiz | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
| Model | Matiz | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 995 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 152 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.7 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2360 mm |
