2008 Daewoo Rezzo vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (188 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2008 Daewoo Rezzo. (103 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2008 Daewoo Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 669 kg more than 2008 Daewoo Rezzo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Daewoo Rezzo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Daewoo Rezzo. (142 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Daewoo Rezzo | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Daewoo | Toyota |
| Model | Rezzo | Tundra |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1597 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 103 HP | 188 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1347 kg | 2016 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3270 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 100 L |
