2008 Daihatsu Cuore vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2008 Daihatsu Cuore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo V50 would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V50 weights approximately 604 kg more than 2008 Daihatsu Cuore.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo V50 (320 Nm) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Daihatsu Cuore. (88 Nm). This means 2005 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Daihatsu Cuore.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Daihatsu Cuore | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
Model | Cuore | V50 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 987 cc | 2519 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 218 HP |
Torque | 88 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 795 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.9 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |