2008 Dodge Charger vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 387 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1966 Lotus Seven has manual transmission. 1966 Lotus Seven will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Charger | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Charger | Seven |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 29 L |