2008 Dodge Charger vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Charger weights approximately 371 kg more than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2008 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Dodge Charger | 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Charger | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2680 mm |
