2008 Dodge Charger vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Charger (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1573 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Charger (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Dodge Charger | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Dodge | Zastava |
| Model | Charger | 102 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2160 mm |
