2008 Dodge Charger vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Charger | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Charger | Econoline |
Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 570 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3510 mm |