2008 Dodge Charger vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota ES 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota ES 3 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1643 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 2008 Dodge Charger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota ES 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Charger | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Charger | ES 3 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2320 mm |