2008 Dodge Charger vs. 2002 Toyota FXS
To start off, 2008 Dodge Charger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota FXS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota FXS would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 2002 Toyota FXS. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2002 Toyota FXS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Charger (570 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Toyota FXS. (270 Nm). This means 2008 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Toyota FXS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Dodge Charger | 2002 Toyota FXS | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Charger | FXS |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6059 cc | 4290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 425 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 570 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 55 L |
