2008 Dodge Dakota vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (360 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Dodge Dakota. (319 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Dodge Dakota.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Dodge Dakota | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Dodge | Holden |
| Model | Dakota | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3340 mm | 2685 mm |
