2008 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1966 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,952 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan (240 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 70 kg more than 1966 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan (343 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1966 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Dodge | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Caravan | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3952 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2700 mm |
