2008 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 3,952 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 961 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan has automatic transmission and 1982 Volkswagen Polo has manual transmission. 1982 Volkswagen Polo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | Grand Caravan | Polo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3952 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 40 L |