2008 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK would be higher. At 3,952 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK weights approximately 359 kg more than 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan.
Because 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Grand Caravan | 1995 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Grand Caravan | SLK |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3952 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 53 L |