2008 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 2003 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan weights approximately 136 kg more than 2003 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2003 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Grand Caravan | 2003 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Grand Caravan | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3950 cc | 3934 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 249 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1881 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 59 L |