2008 Dodge Grand Caravan vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan would be higher. At 3,952 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 469 kg more than 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan has automatic transmission and 2013 Volvo XC90 has manual transmission. 2013 Volvo XC90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Dodge Grand Caravan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Grand Caravan | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Grand Caravan | XC90 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3952 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 2160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5150 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2857 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 8.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |