2008 Dodge Magnum vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Dodge Magnum is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Magnum (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Magnum should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 19 kg more than 2008 Dodge Magnum.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Dodge Magnum (339 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Dodge Magnum will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Dodge Magnum | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Dodge | Jeep |
Model | Magnum | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 78 L |