2008 Dodge Ram vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 2008 Dodge Ram is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1949 Hudson Commodore. (128 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1949 Hudson Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Ram weights approximately 36 kg more than 1949 Hudson Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Dodge Ram | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | Dodge | Hudson |
| Model | Ram | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3070 mm | 3160 mm |
