2008 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Lotus 25
To start off, 2008 Dodge Ram is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus 25 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 Lotus 25. (196 HP @ 9500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1236 kg more than 1963 Lotus 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Dodge Ram | 1963 Lotus 25 | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Ram | 25 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3701 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 196 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1692 kg | 456 kg |
